Journal La Lifesci acknowledges that generative artificial intelligence tools, including large language models, can be valuable in supporting scholarly writing and research when applied responsibly. Their use must always be transparent and must not compromise the integrity, originality, or accountability of the scholarly record.

1. Authorship
   Generative artificial intelligence tools cannot be listed as an author or co author. Authorship requires accountability for the content, the ability to respond to peer review, and responsibility for the integrity of the work. Artificial intelligence tools cannot assume these roles or responsibilities.

2. Acceptable Use
   Authors may apply artificial intelligence tools for purposes such as language editing, grammar improvement, and formatting assistance. These applications must remain non substantive and must not alter the interpretation of research findings. Use of artificial intelligence for data analysis, image creation, literature review, or content generation requires particular caution. Authors must verify accuracy and avoid inclusion of fabricated, plagiarized, or misleading material.

3. Transparency and Disclosure
   If artificial intelligence tools are used at any stage of manuscript preparation, authors must clearly disclose this in the manuscript. This disclosure should include the name of the tool, its version, the provider, the purpose of its use, and confirmation that the authors have checked the accuracy and originality of all content produced or assisted by the tool.
   Example disclosure:
   “Portions of the language in this manuscript were assisted by [AI Tool Name, Version] for grammar and style improvements. The authors take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the content.”

4. Responsibility for Content
   Authors remain fully responsible for every part of the manuscript, including material generated or assisted by artificial intelligence tools. They must ensure that such content is free from plagiarism, factual errors, bias, and unlawful elements.

5. Peer Review and Editorial Use
   Editors and reviewers may apply artificial intelligence tools to support language improvement and to increase workflow efficiency. Artificial intelligence tools must not be used to evaluate the scientific validity of a manuscript. All editorial decisions must be based on human judgment.

6. Ethical Alignment
   This policy follows the guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics. The journal will review and update the policy periodically to ensure continued alignment with evolving best practices in the ethical use of artificial intelligence in scholarly publishing.