Analysis of Factors Influencing the Decision of Couples of Reproductive Age on the Selection of Intra-Uterine Devise Contraceptive Devices

  • Nurfajryaty Nurfajryaty Master of Public Health Science, Helvetia Institute of Health, Medan, Indonesia
  • Asriwati Asriwati Lecturer of Master of Public Health Sciences, Helvetia Institute of Health, Medan, Indonesia
  • Indah Anggraini Lecturer of Master of Public Health Sciences, Helvetia Institute of Health, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Role of Health Officers, IUD, EFA

Abstract

Introduction In 2021 the number of PUS in the working area of the Calang Health Center is 3,037 people with 1,984 active family planning participants (65.52%) and 517 MKJP users, namely IUDs (25.97%). This shows that MKJP users, namely IUDs in the working area of the Calang Health Center work area, are still relatively low considering the number of PUS and active family planning participants is very high. This method is a combination (mixed methods research) Accidental Sampling technique 95 samples on quantitative and 9 informants on qualitative . Quantitative data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate and multivariate. Qualitative data by data reduction, presentation and drawing conclusions. Quantitative results there is no relationship between knowledge, there is a relationship between attitude, socio-culture, parity, husband's support, officer support, and there is no significant relationship between distance, facilities, to the selection of intra-uterine device devices ( IUD), Logistic regression test results Attitude OR= 1.897 Socio-cultural OR= 3.160 husband support OR= 2.804 role of health workers OR= 4.183, the role of the officer is the dominant independent variable influencing the choice of intra uterine devise contraception (IUD) with OR = 4,183. The results of the qualitative analysis show that the majority of PUS do not choose intrauterine device (IUD) contraception, due to the prevailing habits in society. It is recommended that the Health Service evaluate family planning services, it is hoped that they will provide proper and clear counseling about IUDs to PUS as the target audience.

References

Affandi, B. (2014). Buku panduan praktis pelayanan kontrasepsi. Jakarta: Pustaka B, editor.

Beyer, M., Lenz, R., & Kuhn, K. A. (2006). Health Information Systems (Informationssysteme im Gesundheitswesen). it-Information Technology, 48(1), 6-11.

BKKBN. (2020). Laporan Kinerja 2019. Lemb Adm Negara. 1689–99.

Destyowati, M. (2012). Hubungan Tingkat Pengetahuan Ibu Tentang Kontrasepsi IUD Dengan Minat Pemakaian Kontrasepsi IUD Di Des Harjobinangun Kecamatan Grabak Kabupaten Purworejo Tahun 2011. Jurnal Komunikasi Kesehatan, 3(2).

Dinkes Aceh Jaya. (2019). Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten Aceh Jaya. Dinas Kesehat Aceh Jaya.

Erfandi. (2015). Konversi Peserta Keluarga Berencana Menurut Jenis Kontrasepsi. Jakarta: Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo; 2015.

Mahmudah, L. T. N., & Indrawati, F. (2015). Analisis faktor yang berhubungan dengan pemilihan metode kontrasepsi jangka panjang (MKJP) pada akseptor KB Wanita di Kecamatan Banyubiru Kabupaten Semarang. Unnes Journal of Public Health, 4(3).

Maryani, H. (2008). Cara tepat memilih alat kontrasepsi keluarga berencana bagi wanita. Puslitbang Pelayanan dan Teknologi Kesehatan: Depkes RI.

Muyassaroh, Y., Zubaeda, Z., Saragih, H. S., Pulungan, F., Batubara, A., Azizah, N., ... & Aswan, Y. (2022). Dokumentasi Kebidanan. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Statistics. W. H. (2019). WHO. 5–10.

Surinati, I. D. A. K. (2014). Gambaran Faktor Dominan Penyebab Rendahnya Akseptor IUD pada Pasangan Usia Subur. Jurnal Gema Keperawatan, 7(2), 130-133.

Published
2022-12-15
How to Cite
Nurfajryaty, N., Asriwati, A., & Anggraini, I. (2022). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Decision of Couples of Reproductive Age on the Selection of Intra-Uterine Devise Contraceptive Devices. Journal La Medihealtico, 3(5), 438-448. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallamedihealtico.v3i5.741