The Effectiveness of Differentiating Mathematics Learning in Arithmetic Sequence to Support Computational Thinking Ability
Abstract
The purpose of this research work is to examine the impact of differentiation in mathematics on CT performance of high school learners. Using a pre-experimental one-shot case study design, the study enslisted 35 students from SMAN 8 Palembang teaching mathematics with the topic arithmetic sequences. Quantitative data revealed significant improvements in all CT components, with decomposition and pattern recognition emerging as strengths (mean score: 85.3, ttt-value;14.25, ppp value; 0.00001. Observations included quantitative results for student participation, valuable peer interactions, and appropriate and appropriate uses of Strategies CT, as well as qualitative results for the visual and tiered means of differentiation incorporated into the lesson. The work supports what can be done in terms of differentiation and the assurance of learning and competencies of learners in mathematics education for all. Still, the obstacles like the asynchronous development of abstraction and algorithmization make it pertinent for refining the directions of instructions. This theoretical and practical work advances two bodies of knowledge: incorporating CT within settings of differentiation learning and promoting interdisciplinary use of the concept. That is why future studies should be directed toward experimental application, the relation of such interventions to other mathematical concepts, and their long term outcomes.
References
Abdelshiheed, M., Hostetter, J. W., Barnes, T., & Chi, M. (2023). Bridging declarative, procedural, and conditional metacognitive knowledge gap using deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11739. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11739
Akbari, U. F., Khasna, F. T., Meilani, D., & Seran, Y. B. (2022). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Alam, A. (2022, March). Educational robotics and computer programming in early childhood education: a conceptual framework for assessing elementary school students’ computational thinking for designing powerful educational scenarios. In 2022 International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTSN53084.2022.9761354
Amirova, A., Fteropoulli, T., Ahmed, N., Cowie, M. R., & Leibo, J. Z. (2024). Framework-based qualitative analysis of free responses of Large Language Models: Algorithmic fidelity. Plos one, 19(3), e0300024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300024
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47-57.
Annisa, R., & Kartini, K. (2021). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal barisan dan deret aritmatika menggunakan tahapan kesalahan Newman. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 522–532. Annisa, R., & Kartini, K. (2021). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal barisan dan deret aritmatika menggunakan tahapan kesalahan Newman. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.506
Azmi, R. D., & Ummah, S. K. (2021). Analisis kemampuan computational thinking dalam pembuatan media pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika: Judika Education, 4(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v4i1.2273
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Diantary, V. A., & Akbar, B. (2022). Perbandingan keterampilan computational thinking antara sekolah dasar akreditasi a dengan sekolah dasar akreditasi b pada mata pelajaran matematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 2749–2756. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1576
Huang, W., & Looi, C. K. (2021). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 31(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411
Ingman, V. M., Schaefer, A. J., Andreola, L. R., & Wheeler, S. E. (2021). QChASM: Quantum chemistry automation and structure manipulation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 11(4), e1510. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.151
Irianto, T., Arifin, R., & Firmansyah, M. (2021). The Relationship of Physical Activities and Student Learning Outcomes of Physical Education. Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 5(2), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v5i2.16376
Lyon, J. A., & J. Magana, A. (2020). Computational thinking in higher education: A review of the literature. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(5), 1174-1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22295
Norma, N., Puji, P., Putriyani, S., & Nurdin, N. (2024). Literature Review: Penggunaan Media Powtoon dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi untuk Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i2.1962
Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers' Perspectives on the Use of Differentiated Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms: Implication for Teacher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p136
Putri, M. A., Botifar, M., & Syaripah, S. (2024). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Ilustrasi Visual Dalam Peningkatan High Order Thingking And Skills (HOTS) Siswa (Doctoral dissertation, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup).
Sausan, S., Sirait, S., Salihin, S., & Siregar, R. (2024). Studi Literatur: Pemanfaatan Web Wordwall Untuk Melatih Kemampuan Computational Thinking Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 2(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v2i2.479
Susilowati, D., Apriani, A., Agustin, K., & Dasriani, N. G. A. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pedagogik Guru melalui Program Pelatihan dan Pendampingan Bekelanjutan dalam Pembelajaran Computational Thinking pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. ADMA: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 1(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.30812/adma.v1i2.1015
Susilowati, R., Sugiyono, S., & Chasanah, E. (2016). Nutritional and albumin content of swamp fishes from Merauke, Papua, Indonesia. Squalen Bulletin of Marine and Fisheries Postharvest and Biotechnology, 11(3), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.15578/squalen.268
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A., Moon, T., & Imbeau, M. B. (2015). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom, white paper. Retrieved September, 10, 2018.
Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C., & Hsu, C. Y. (2021). The computational thinking scale for computer literacy education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 579-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120972356
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Yasmin, Y., & Negara, H. R. P. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Computational Thinking ditinjau dari Self-Confidence Siswa. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i2.2089
Zippert, E. L., Douglas, A. A., Tian, F., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2021). Helping preschoolers learn math: The impact of emphasizing the patterns in objects and numbers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1370.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal La Edusci

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.