Leadership Training Program at Faculty of Psychology, Bosowa University

Titin Florentina Purwasetiawatik; Misykat Malik  Ibrahim; Muhammad Nur Akbar  Rasyid

doi:10.37899/journallaedusci.v5i5.1760

Titin Florentina Purwasetiawatik Universitas Bosowa Makassar
Misykat Malik Ibrahim UIN Alauddin Makassar
Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid UIN Alauddin Makassar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v5i5.1760

Keywords: Kirkpatrick model evaluation, leadership training, students

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation of the Kirkpatrick model evaluation of levels 1, 2 and 3 of the student leadership training programs at the Faculty of Psychology, Bosowa University, Makassar. This study uses a mix method (quantitative-qualitative). This study involved 33 participants. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, observations, and documentation. The results of the study showed that level 1, participant reactions measured by a Kirkpatrick reaction sheet questionnaire, that leadership training participants were satisfied with the available schedule components and were very satisfied with the committee components, facilities, content, speakers and materials. At level 2, which was measured through a pre-post t-test, there was a change in participant knowledge and skills with a significant average learning evaluation value. At level 3, which was described from the interview results, there was a change in behavior in 4 components, namely personality, interpersonal communication, cooperation skills and leadership skills, although the changes were not significantly consistent for 33 participants within 1.5 months. The Kirkpatrick evaluation model is effective in assessing the level of participant satisfaction, increased knowledge and changes in behavior of leadership training participants. The leadership training program is very effective to be carried out continuously every year as an effort to shape the character of students who are ethical, innovative, broad-minded, and have global competitiveness. The material provided is more varied, adjusted to the development and context of the generation. Carrying out activities according to the training guidelines and inviting more students to actively participate.

References

Abubakar, H. R. I. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian. SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Agis, D. P. (2021). Penggunaan Aplikasi Tik Tok dan Efeknya Terhadap perilaku keagamaan remaja islam di kelurahan waydadi baru kecamatan sukarame (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG).

Amrulloh, M. H., Hidayat, A., & Ibrahim, T. (2024). MANAJEMEN PELATIHAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA:(Penelitian di MTs Az-Zahra dan MTs Negeri 02 Bandung Barat). Cendikia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(4), 223-244.

Arthur, R. (2018). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan ISSN 1410-4725 (print) ISSN 2338-6061 (online). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 35–48. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep

Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Logemann, M., Heidewald, J., Aritz, J., & Swartz, S. (2024). Competencies needed by business professionals in the AI age: Character and communication lead the way. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231208166

Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human resource management review, 33(1), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications,inc.

Dishon, G., & Gilead, T. (2021). Adaptability and its discontents: 21st-century skills and the preparation for an unpredictable future. British Journal of Educational Studies, 69(4), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2020.1829545

Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome mapping: Building learning and reflection into development programs. IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA.

Fetrianto, F. (2017). Penerapan Formative Summative Evaluation Model Dalam Penelitian Tindakan. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Olahraga, 1(1), 408–421.

Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models (Vol. 31). John Wiley & Sons.

Grigoropoulos, J. E. (2020). How Can Manifesting Leadership Skills Infused with Ethos, Empathy, and Compassion Better Prepare Students to Assume Leadership Roles?. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.5

Gupta, J., Mitra, B., & Garg, K. (2021). Technological disruptions reshaping management education: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. International Journal of Management in Education, 15(2), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2021.113526

Hamalik, O. (2020). Psikologi belajar dan mengajar. Sinar Baru Algesindo Bandung.

Hutahaean, B. (2021). Pengembangan model evaluasi kurikulum multidimensi untuk Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Penerbit NEM.

Ibnu, S. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, 12–26.

Ibrahim, M. M. (2018). Penelitian Evaluasi Bidang Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kualitatif).

Kemendikbud. (2022). pedoman pelaksanaan kegiatan organisasi kemahasiswaan tahun 2022. Dirjen Dikti.

Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Lestari, C. R., Fahmy, Z., Wati, M. L. K., Wagiran, W., & Subyantoro, S. (2024). Tinjauan Holistik Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing di UIN Walisongo: Pendekatan Inovatif dengan Model CIPP. GERAM: Gerakan Aktif Menulis, 12(1), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2024.17232

Mar’at, K. (2006). Perilaku Manusia (Polhaupessy (ed.); pertama). PT. Refika Aditama.

Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2021). The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12547

McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackeray, R. (2022). Planning, implementing and evaluating health promotion programs. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Mohammad, F., Andi, S. M., & Karyanti, K. (2022). Evaluation of the CSE-UCLA model on the performance of school counselor in Indonesia. Перспективы науки и образования, (2 (56)), 561-572. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.2.33

Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on workers’ skills: Upskilling and reskilling in organisations. Informing Science, 26, 39-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.28945/5078

Muda, W. A. (2017). Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick (Level 1 dan 2) Diklat Teknis Substantif Pembina Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Keagamaan pada SMP di Pusdiklat Tenaga Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan.

Mulyasa, H. E. (2022). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah. Bumi Aksara.

Pamuji, S., & Limei, S. (2023). The Managerial Competence Of The Madrasa Head In Improving Teacher Professionalism And Performance At Mi Al-Maarif Bojongsari, Cilacap District. Pengabdian: Jurnal Abdimas, 1(2), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.55849/abdimas.v1i2.158

Rony, Z. T., Lestari, T. S., Ismaniah, Yasin, M., & Lubis, F. M. (2023). The complexity of leadership competence in universities in the 21st century. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2276986. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2276986

Rusmulyani, K., Yudana, I. M., Natajaya, I. N., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2022). E-Evaluation based on CSE-UCLA Model Refers to Glickman Pattern for Evaluating the Leadership Training Program. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(5), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130534

Sanni, D. M., & Babussalam, B. (2022). Fullfillment Of Educational Rights For Woman Through Women’s Schools In Aengbaja Kenek Village. THE JOURNAL OF SOCIO-LEGAL AND ISLAMIC LAW, 1(2), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.30651/jssl.v1i2.20628

Saptono, Y. J. (2016). Motivasi dan keberhasilan belajar siswa. REGULA FIDEI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 1(1), 181-204.

Spencer, L.M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work : Models for superior. performance. New York : John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Stake, R. (1995). Case study research. thousand oaks, CA: Sage.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (Vol. 50). John Wiley & Sons.

Syah, M. E., & Pertiwi, D. S. (2024). Psikologi belajar. Feniks Muda Sejahtera.

Tahap, C. D. a N., Sains, P., Kesediaan, K., Mrsm, G. S. D. I., & Halim, L. (2014). Jurnal kepimpinan pendidikan |. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 1(April), 53–64. http://umrefjournal.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/6255/Template 4.pdf

Togneri, W., & Anderson, S. E. (2003). Beyond Islands of Excellence: What Districts Can Do To Improve Instruction and Achievement in All Schools. A Project of the Learning First Alliance [and] A Leadership Brief.

Tulung, J. M. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan dan pelatihan kepemimpinan tingkat IV di Balai Diklat Keagamaan Manado. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 3(3).

Walgito, B. (2005). Pengantar Psikologi Umum (kelima). C.V. Andi Offset.