Innovation in Complaints about Targeted Electricity Subsidy Participation in the Context of Improving Public Services

Elisabet Yakoba; Achmad Lutfi

doi:10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i4.880

Elisabet Yakoba Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, University of Indonesia
Achmad Lutfi Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, University of Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i4.880

Keywords: Innovation, Public Service, Targeted Electricity Subsidy, Complaints, PEDULI

Abstract

In order to improve the quality of public services, one of the efforts made by the government is to make a new breakthrough through the targeted electricity subsidy complaint application (PEDULI). This research aims to analyze innovations in improving public services using the mobile-based PEDULI application. This research uses 5 (five) innovation indicators according to Rogers, namely relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, triability, and observability which are used to analyze improvements in public services, in this case the targeted electricity subsidy complaint service through the mobile-based PEDULI application. This research uses post-positivism methods which are carried out using data collection techniques using in-depth interviews, observation and documentation studies. Based on the research, the results show that in mobile-based public service innovation complaints about targeted electricity subsidies (PEDULI) have experienced a good increase and have met the public's need to make complaints regarding targeted electricity subsidy membership.

References

Alam, A. (2021, December). Should robots replace teachers? Mobilisation of AI and learning analytics in education. In 2021 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, and Control (ICAC3) (pp. 1-12). IEEE.

Brown, M. A., Soni, A., Lapsa, M. V., Southworth, K., & Cox, M. (2020). High energy burden and low-income energy affordability: Conclusions from a literature review. Progress in Energy, 2(4), 042003.

Bungin, B. (2003). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Ugm Press.

Ellitan, L. (2020). Competing in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1-12.

Indrawan, R., & Yaniawati, P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan campuran. Revisi. Nurul Farah Atif (ed.). Bandung, Refika Aditama.

Newell, R. G., Pizer, W. A., & Raimi, D. (2019). US federal government subsidies for clean energy: Design choices and implications. Energy Economics, 80, 831-841.

Redjeki, F., & Affandi, A. (2021). Utilization of digital marketing for MSME players as value creation for customers during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(1), 40-55.

Suwarno, Y. (2008). Inovasi di Sektor Publik. Jakarta: STIA - LAN Press.