Employee Professionality in the Bureau General Planning and Budget Polda Gorontalo

Widya Kurniati Mohi; Apris Ara Tilome; Fitri D Mohune

doi:10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i2.806

Widya Kurniati Mohi Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
Apris Ara Tilome Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social Science, Muhammadiyah Gorontalo, Indonesia
Fitri D Mohune Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social Science, Muhammadiyah Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i2.806

Keywords: Employee, Professionality, Bureau

Abstract

This study aims to determine the Professionality of Employees in the General Planning and Budget Bureau of the Gorontalo Regional Police. The research method uses a qualitative type. The results showed that the professionalism of employees in the General Planning and Budget Bureau of the Gorontalo Regional Police was not optimal. This can be seen from the 3 (three) indicators used as research benchmarks, only one indicator is considered fulfilled, namely the response indicator indicated by the speed of employees in providing services to line work units related to socialization requests, supervision and budget allocations. The other two indicators, namely the creativity indicator and the innovation indicator, are considered to have not been fulfilled, this is because some employees or personnel do not have the authority to carry out an innovation because they do not have the qualifications and competencies in their position so that so far the existing employees or personnel only work according to regulations. existing or in other words work normatively.

References

Arikunto, S, (2003) Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, edisi revisi, Bumi Aksara, Yogyakarta

Asfandiyar, Andi Y. (2012). Creative Parenting Today. Bandung. Penerbit Kaifa

Asgaruddin, A. (2023). Work Professionalism Through Work Discipline on Employee Performance (a Literature Study Human Resource Management). Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(6), 1104-1114.

Kaswan. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Untuk Keunggulan Bersaing Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Kleysen, R.F., & Street, C.T. (2001). Toward a Multi-dimensional Measure of Individual Perilaku inovatif. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2, 284-296

Leidner, R. (1999). Emotional labor in service work. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 561(1), 81-95.

Montgomery, J. E. (2007). Incorporating emotional intelligence concepts into legal education: Strengthening the professionalism of law students. U. Tol. L. Rev., 39, 323.

Said, N. B., & Chiang, V. C. (2020). The knowledge, skill competencies, and psychological preparedness of nurses for disasters: a systematic review. International emergency nursing, 48, 100806.

Sarwono Jonathan, (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta :Graha Ilmu

Sedarmayanti. (2017). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan SDM untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi, Kinerja dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama

Semiawan, C. R. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sugiyono. (2015). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suyanto. (2012). Pendidikan Karakter dalam Persfektif Teori dan Praktik . Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Taylor, S. (2006). Acquaintance, meritocracy and critical realism: Researching recruitment and selection processes in smaller and growth organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 16(4), 478-489.

Vigoda‐Gadot, E., & Meisler, G. (2010). Emotions in management and the management of emotions: The impact of emotional intelligence and organizational politics on public sector employees. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 72-86.