English Teachers’ Instructional Communication in Implementing Finnish-Based Innovative Learning: A Case Study

  • Alma Ferbyana Faculty of Communication Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Deddy Mulyana Faculty of Communication Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Hadi Suprapto Faculty of Communication Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Keywords: Instructional Communication, English Language Learning, Student-Centered Learning, Qualitative Case Study, Finnish Educational Approach

Abstract

Instructional communication plays a central role in shaping meaningful learning experiences, particularly within student-centered and dialogical educational paradigms. This study aims to explore the forms and implementation of instructional communication in English learning based on the Finnish educational approach at Mutiara Insani Junior High School, Purwakarta. Employing a qualitative case study design, the research focuses on English teachers and eighth-grade students as the main subjects. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing with triangulation to ensure credibility. The findings reveal that instructional communication in English learning is implemented in multimodal and contextual forms, including verbal-bilingual communication, nonverbal communication, media-supported communication, hands-on activities, collaborative interaction, and affective communication. Teachers position themselves as facilitators who encourage dialogue, provide constructive feedback, and create a psychologically safe learning environment. The integration of Finnish-based learning principles emphasizes student-centeredness, joyful learning, contextual relevance, and minimal exam orientation. Supporting factors include positive teacher–student relationships, flexible teaching strategies, and the use of varied media, while inhibiting factors involve differences in student proficiency, emotional readiness, time limitations, and vocabulary constraints.

References

Aarto-Pesonen, L., & Piirainen, A. (2020). Teacher students’ meaningful learning in widening learning worlds. Teaching Education, 31(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1561662

Adeoye, M. A., Prastikawati, E. F., & Abimbowo, Y. O. (2024). Empowering learning: Pedagogical strategies for advancing 21st century skills and quality education. Journal of Nonformal Education, 10(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i1.1451

Ahmad, Z., Muhammad, A. A., & Mislaini, M. (2024). Inovasi dalam pendidikan: Pembelajaran dari Finlandia untuk transformasi pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudistira: Publikasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Bahasa Учредители: Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia, 3(1), 13-30.

Al Wasim, A., Syukur, F., & Wahib, A. (2026). The Exemplary of Kiai and the Future Orientation of Santri: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective in the Pesantren Subculture. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v7i2.2586

Bakar, S. (2021). Investigating the dynamics of contemporary pedagogical approaches in higher education through innovations, challenges, and paradigm shifts. Social Science Chronicle, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2021.009

Bishop, M. J. (2013). Instructional message design: Past, present, and future relevance. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 373-383). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_30

Bozorgian, H. (2012). The relationship between listening and other language skills in international English language testing system. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 657-663. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.657-663

Diaz, A., Cochran, K., & Karlin, N. (2016). The influence of teacher power on English language learners' self-perceptions of learner empowerment. College teaching, 64(4), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1126801

Ferreira, J. M., Zabolotna, K., & Lee, S. (2025). Teaching twenty-first-century skills: Examining collaborative learning in initial teacher education in Finnish universities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(7), 1319-1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2419078

Figueroa, S. K. (2008). The grounded theory and the analysis of audio-visual texts. International Journal of social research Methodology, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701605897

Firdaus, M., & Katili, K. R. D. (2025). Instructional communication as a catalyst for improving student motivation and engagement. Linkage, 2(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.61511/linkage.v2i1.2025.1788

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Praise for Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World. Corwin. Ontario Principals Council.

Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2015). Research on learning and instruction: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601866

Hoidn, S., & Reusser, K. (2020). Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching. In The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 17-46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259371

Hsbollah, H. M., & Hassan, H. (2022). Creating meaningful learning experiences with active, fun, and technology elements in the problem-based learning approach and its implications. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), 19(1), 147-181. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.6

Ibrahim, J. (2001). The implementation of EMI (English medium instruction) in Indonesian universities: Its opportunities, its threats, its problems, and its possible solutions. K@ ta: a Biannual Publication on the study of Language and literature, 3(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.3.2.121-138

Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., ... & Kansanen, P. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research‐based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2010.542559

Kumar, A. (2008). Development education and dialogical learning in the 21st century. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.01.1.04

Lakkala, S., Galkienė, A., Navaitienė, J., Cierpiałowska, T., Tomecek, S., & Uusiautti, S. (2021). Teachers supporting students in collaborative ways—An analysis of collaborative work creating supportive learning environments for every student in a school: Cases from Austria, Finland, Lithuania, and Poland. Sustainability, 13(5), 2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052804

Lie, A. (2007). Education policy and EFL curriculum in Indonesia: Between the commitment to competence and the quest for higher test scores. Teflin, 18(1), 1-14.

Loua, Y. O. P. (2023). The Impact of Using Gagne’s Nine Events of Instruction on Student’s Academic Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online English Course for French Speakers (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Alabama).

McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Bennett, V. E. (2006). The relationships of student end-of-class motivation with teacher communication behaviors and instructional outcomes. Communication education, 55(4), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600702562

Morreale, S., Backlund, P., & Sparks, L. (2014). Communication education and instructional communication: Genesis and evolution as fields of inquiry. Communication Education, 63(4), 344-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.944926

Myers, S. A., Goodboy, A. K., & Members of Comm 600. (2014). College student learning, motivation, and satisfaction as a function of effective instructor communication behaviors. Southern Communication Journal, 79(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2013.815266

Navickienė, V., Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., Valantinaitė, I., & Žilinskaitė-Vytienė, V. (2019). The relationship between communication and education through the creative personality of the teacher. Creativity studies, 12(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.6472

Nissinen, S., Vartiainen, H., Vanninen, P., & Pöllänen, S. (2019). Connected learning in international learning projects: Emergence of a hybrid learning system. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(5), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2018-0055

Nurpahmi, S. (2017). Teacher Talk in Classroom Interaction. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning and Research Journal), 3 (1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V31.2017.A4

Priadi, R. (2020). Teacher communication effectiveness in the learning process. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 3433-3444. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i4.1378

Qoiriah, V. F., & Febrianto, A. R. (2025). Investigating the Implementation of Student-Centered Learning in an EFL Class at an Indonesian Private School. EDUJ: English Education Journal, 3(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.59966/eduj.v3i1.1602

Rahmah, I. M., & Hanif, M. (2026). Contextualizing Islamic Education: Value Transformation and Religious Moderation in Bonokeling's Dual Authority System. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 5(1), 1218-1231.

Samudra, A., Rohmah, N., & Khairul, C. (2026). The Role of Mediator Communication in Symbolic Interaction of Divorce Mediation at The Sidoarjo Religious Court. Journal of Religion, Local Politics, and Law, 2(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.64595/jrlpl.v2n1.p103-126

Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational researcher, 7(2), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X007002005

Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of research in education, 32(1), 328-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308968

Tiwow, G. M., Arsana, I. K. S., & Dolonseda, H. P. (2025). Designing a transglobal leadership model to optimize holistic learning within the independent learning framework. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v9i1.13568

Wheeless, L. R., & Thomas Hurt, H. (1979). Instructional communication theory and research: An overview of instructional strategies as instructional communication systems. Annals of the International Communication Association, 3(1), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1979.11923781

Wungu, R. N. R. S., Nisa, M. C., Firdaus, M. H. A., Syaripudin, U., & Erawati, T. (2024). Exploring student-centered instructions in English as a foreign language (EFL) learning in Indonesia through trioethnographic reflections. Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.46963/asatiza.v5i3.1885

Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011–2019). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491-523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000208

Published
2026-05-30
How to Cite
Ferbyana, A., Mulyana, D., & Suprapto, H. (2026). English Teachers’ Instructional Communication in Implementing Finnish-Based Innovative Learning: A Case Study . Journal La Sociale, 7(3), 801-822. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v7i3.2980