Pawning Online Game Accounts From a Civil Law Perspective: A Case Study
Abstract
The use of games today is no longer limited to mere entertainment; the function of games has expanded into sports and business. One unique aspect of games in the business world is the existence of game accounts with significant economic value. Several factors, including quality, demand, and the rarity of items within the account, influence the economic value of a game account. In its development, game accounts are no longer limited to buying and selling; recently, a business entity has utilized game accounts as collateral. This requires further examination from the property law perspective and relevant security law regarding online game accounts. This study employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, utilizing legal regulations and academic articles as sources of law. The research findings indicate that the owner of an online game account is merely a possessor and does not possess property rights over the account itself, as property rights are inherently tied to ownership. Ownership remains solely with the game developer/publisher, while the player only obtains a license. It is crucial to be aware of the legal limitations, as the nature of the account transfer agreement is invalid because it does not comply with the fourth element of Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code, so any agreement intended to transfer an account is deemed null and void. The pawn scheme from @sytnaxgadaigame is invalid because it does not meet the principles of Security Law.
References
Adil, U. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Bisnis (2nd ed.). Jakarta : Mitra Wacana Media .
Agustina, A., Ambarwati, R., & Sari, H. M. K. (2023). Social media as digital marketing tool in MSME: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 266-279. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v13i1.1534
Baihaqi, Y., Santoso, R., & Zaharah, R. (2025). The Practice of the Contract in the Arrum Haji Product from an Islamic Law Perspective at Pegadaian Syari'ah Bandar Lampung. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i8.18436
Bentara, B., Iskandar, I., Setianingrat, E., Permana, D. Y., & Dikrurahman, D. (2025). Legal Responsibility For Perpetrators Of Online Gambling Crimes. Journal of World Science, 4(5), 512-521. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i5.1408
Caroux, L., Isbister, K., Le Bigot, L., & Vibert, N. (2015). Player–video game interaction: A systematic review of current concepts. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 366–381. Pergamon. Retrieved September 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.066
Deswita, D., Farisal, U., Purwanto, E., Naila, S. S., Putri, K. A. W., Putri, K. W., ... & Pratiwi, E. E. (2024). Digital media consumption trends and changing consumer mindsets: A case study of online shopping behavior. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Komunikasi Digital, 1(4), 8-8. https://doi.org/10.47134/jbkd.v1i4.2839
Dwi Rizkia, N., & Fardiansyah, H. (2022). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV Widina Media Utama.
Ekel, K. R. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Proses Jual Beli Online Berdasarkan Peraturan Hukum Di Indonesia. LEX PRIVATUM, 13(1). Retrieved September 4, 2025, from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/53801
Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual Property. 85 Boston University Law Review 1047 (2005). Retrieved September 1, 2025, from https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1787
Hadiani, Z., Winda Triyani, N., Nikmah, H., Muliatul Qamari, M., Rahayu C.N, B. B., Sanubari, I., Tsani, Q., et al. (2024). Edukasi kesadaran bahaya kecanduan game online dan dampaknya terhadap perilaku keagamaan siswa. DARMADIKSANI, Jurnal Pengabdian Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Humaniora, 4(2).
Interviews. (n.d.). .
Kahila, J., Valtonen, T., López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M., Vartiainen, H., Kahila, S., & Tedre, M. (2025). A typology of metagamers: Identifying player types based on beyond the game activities. Games and Culture, 20(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231187758
Listiavanti, G., & Hermono, B. (2022). Legalitas Akun Game Online Sebagai Objek Perjanjian Jual Beli. Novum : Jurnal Hukum, 9(4).
Mulya, W. J., & Sutrisno. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Publisher Game Online Atas Keberlakuan Game Online Sejenis Tanpa Lisensi Berbasis Private Server Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Hak Cipta. Kabillah : Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 189–201. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from https://ejournal.iainata.ac.id/index.php/kabilah/article/view/381
Musadad, A. (2020). Hukum Jaminan (1st ed.). Malang: CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.
Novitasari, L., Wardiyah, A., Kusumaningsih, D., Setiawati, S., Gustiani, D., & Sartika, D. (2022). Penyuluhan kesehatan tentang bahaya game online. JOURNAL OF Public Health Concerns, 2(2), 70–76.
Palu, S., Arief, A., & Aswari, A. (2025). When Games Turn Into Debt: Legal Analysis of Online Game Transactions. ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56087/qp0av284
Putra, I. G. M. D. D., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2024). Tafsiran Transaksi Akun Game Online Serta Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Yang Terkena Scam dan Penipuan (BEDROG). Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik, 1(4), 174–186. Asosiasi Seni Desain dan Komunikasi Visual Indonesia. Retrieved September 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i4.522
Rustam, R. (2017). Hukum Jaminan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: UII Press Yogyakarta.
Sari, A. K., & Haryati, S. (2023a). Akun Game Online Genshin Impact: Hak Kebendaan dan Legalitas sebagai Objek Jual Beli dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 11(1), 38–50. Padjadjaran Law Review. Retrieved September 14, 2025, from
Sari, A. K., & Haryati, S. (2023b). Akun Game Online Genshin Impact: Hak Kebendaan dan Legalitas sebagai Objek Jual Beli dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 11(1), 40–52.
Sebakas, K., & Santoso, B. (2024). Analisa Yuridis Keabsahan Jual Beli Akun Permainan Daring Secara Backdoor antara Para Game rs ( Pemain Daring ), 17, 695–710.
Setyoningrum, E. W., & Prahara, R. S. (2025). Mobile Banking Service Strategy of Indonesian Syariah Bank (SOAR Analysis Study by Stavros, Cooperrider and Kelly). Create: Journal of Islamic Management and Business, 1(1), 47-58.
Soerjono Soekanto, S. M. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif : suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Song, Y., Escobar, O., Arzubiaga, U., & De Massis, A. (2022). The digital transformation of a traditional market into an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00438-5
Subekti. (1995). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata (27th ed.). Jakarta : Intermasa.
Usman, R. (2016). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan (1st ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Wahid, A. (2025). Kesahan Perjanjian Jual Beli Virtual Property Di Metaverse Berdasarkan Hukum Perjanjian. Universitas Sriwijaya. Sriwijawa.
Yustiani, R., & Yunanto, R. (2017). Peran Marketplace Sebagai Alternatif Bisnis Di Era Teknologi Informasi. Komputa : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer dan Informatika, 6(2), 43–48. Universitas Komputer Indonesia. Retrieved September 4, 2025. https://doi.org/10.34010/komputa.v6i2.2476
Zelminizar. (2019). Problematika Penggunaan Akun Media Sosial Instagram Sebagai Objek Jaminan. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal La Sociale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
