Factors Causing Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Narcotics Cases
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the factors that cause the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases in Indonesia. The disparity of judges' decisions refers to the difference in the results of decisions between one judge and another in similar cases. The factors that cause this disparity can come from various aspects, both internal and external, that affect the objectivity of the judge in giving the verdict. Some of the factors found include differences in interpretation of the law, the social and cultural background of judges, as well as pressure from the public and the media. In addition, the subjectivity of judges and inconsistency in the application of legal provisions also play a role in creating injustice in the criminal justice system. This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature study approach and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases can be minimized by having clear standard operating procedures (SOPs), increasing the capacity of judges in understanding narcotics cases, and providing more intensive professional ethics training. The study also suggests the need for tighter supervision of judges' decisions to ensure that every decision taken is in accordance with the principles of justice and applicable law.
References
Abdurrachman, H., Hamzani, A. I., Majestya, N., & Aravik, H. (2021). From Judge's Decision to Justice: The Role of Transcendental Law to Reinforce Judicial Independence. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 24, 1.
Ardyan, E., Boari, Y., Akhmad, A., Yuliyani, L., Hildawati, H., Suarni, A., Anurogo, D., Ifadah, E., & Judijanto, L. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di Berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Daming, S. (2016). Peluang dan tantangan perwujudan sistem peradilan yang bersih dan berkualitas. YUSTISI, 3(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v3i2.1104
Fokusmedia, T. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Fokusmedia: Bandung.
Freeman, K. R., Hu, C., & Jannetta, J. (2021). Racial equity and criminal justice risk assessment. Urban Institute.
Herindrasti, V. L. S. (2018). Drug-free ASEAN 2025: Tantangan indonesia dalam penanggulangan penyalahgunaan narkoba. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 7(1), 19–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/hi.71122
Indonesia, R., & Nomor, U.-U. (35 C.E.). Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, pasal 1 angka 16. LN.
Johnson, B. D., Spohn, C., & Kimchi, A. (2021). Life lessons: Examining sources of racial and ethnic disparity in federal life without parole sentences. Criminology, 59(4), 704-737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12288
Lin, X., Liu, S., Li, E., & Ma, Y. (2022). Sentencing disparity and sentencing guidelines: the case of China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 127-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-021-09357-0
Loim, J. Y. U., Leo, R. P., & Tallo, D. D. (2023). Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(1), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i1.775
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Jakarta: UI press.
Mulyani, M. (2024). Problems of Criminal Sanctions for Narcotics Abuse: Comparative Study of National Crime and Islamic Crime. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v9i1.4502
Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 319–330.
Purnomo, V. D., & Dewi, A. (2023). Review of the Disparity of Judges’ Decisions in Cases Narcotics Abuse. Indonesian Journal of Economic & Management Sciences, 1(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijems.v1i3.4616
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Rahman, A., Rejo, A., Purnama, D. H., & Zuhir, M. A. (2024). Spatial Analysis of Narcotics Abuse Based on Knowledge, Socio-Demographics, Social Environment, and Swamp Land. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(6), 1895-1907. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i6.4140
Saleh, S. (2017). Analisis data kualitatif. Pustaka Ramadhan, Bandung.
Scott, J. C. (1969). Corruption, machine politics, and political change. American political science review, 63(4), 1142-1158. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955076
Setiawan, D., Juna, A. M., Fadillah, M. S., Oktarianda, S., Zulkarnen, Z., Rizal, A., & Satrio, I. (2024). Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana di Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.144
Spohn, C. (2015). Race, crime, and punishment in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Crime and Justice, 44(1), 49-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/681550
Suherman, C. (2024). Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Penerapan Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemilu. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Sutanto, D. A. (2024). Strategi Humas Badan Narkotika Nasional (Bnn) Pusat Dalam Pencegahan Penggunaan Narkotika Di Media Sosial Instagram@ INFOBNN_RI. Universitas Nasional.
Unayah, N. (2016). Institusi (Penerima) Wajib Lapor Dalam Penanganan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika: Tantangan Dan Solusi Alternatif. Sosio Informa, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v2i2.218
Wardhani, L. T. A. L., Noho, M. D. H., & Natalis, A. (2022). The adoption of various legal systems in Indonesia: an effort to initiate the prismatic Mixed Legal Systems. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2104710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710
Widihastuti, S. (2015). Hakekat dan Karakteristik Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Modul Pembelajaran PKN.
Yuda, I. K. (2015). Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika. Universitas Airlangga.
Yudisial, K. (2017). Problematika Hakim Dalam Ranah Hukum, Pengadilan, dan Masyarakat di Indonesia: Studi Sosio-Legal. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal La Sociale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
