Learning Management System vs Conventional Assessment: Reviewing the Best Assessment for English subjects

  • Shintia Priyeti Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Made Duananda Kartika Degeng Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Agus Wedi Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Keywords: LMS-based Assessment, Conventional Assessment, Learning Management System, English Subject

Abstract

Technological advances in education have encouraged innovation in learning assessment methods, including in English subjects. This article discusses the effectiveness of Learning Management System (LMS) versus conventional assessment in measuring students' English proficiency. Based on a systematic literature review of 15 journals, it explores the advantages and disadvantages of each method, such as speed of feedback, student engagement, and measurement accuracy. Results show that LMS-based assessments offer efficiency, interactivity and the ability to provide detailed data on student performance. However, challenges such as limited access to technology and lack of direct interaction are obstacles. In contrast, conventional assessments outperform in the aspects of social interaction and direct observation, although they are often slower and prone to subjective bias. This study concludes that the LMS has greater potential in improving English learning outcomes, but a combination of both approaches can be an optimal solution. The implications of this study provide insights for educators and policy makers in designing a more effective technology-based curriculum.

References

Ahmed, M. R., & Sidiq, M. A. (2023). Evaluating Online Assessment Strategies: A Systematic Review of Reliability and Validity in E-Learning Environments. computer, 6(12), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10407361

Al Aufi, A., & Rao Naidu, V. (2020). Students’ Perception of The Use of Learning Management System to Facilitate Flipped Learning Experience for English language Teaching in Private Higher Education Institution in Oman: a developmental Evaluation. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3798168

Al-Mamary, Y. H. S. (2022). Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: Credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092

Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning Management System (LMS) Use with Online Instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36

Farhana, F., Suryadi, A., & Wicaksono, D. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Digital pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SMK Atlantis Plus Depok. Instruksional, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24853/instruksional.3.1.1-17

Jamaluddin, N. H. S., Saprin, S., & Rasyid, M. R. (2021). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (Pembatik) di SMP Negeri 6 Batauga Kecamatan Batauga Buton Selatan. Jurnal Mercusuar, 2(3).

Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in physiology education, 42(1), 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017

Mahzum, E., Sofyan, H., Nasrudin, M. F., Mailizar, M., & Herliana, F. (2023). Analysis of the utilization of the Learning Management System (LMS) as a learning media in the Physics Education Department Universitas Syiah Kuala. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1(1), 2596. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012070

Marzuki, M., Indrawati, I., & Yunus, I. (2023). Developing a Comprehensive Reading Test for Undergraduate Students: An LMS-Based Reading Test. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(6), 2398–2409. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i6-34

Mitra, S. (2022). An Action Research Study on LMS Assessment Tools and Faculty Practice in English Composition Courses of a Community College (Doctoral dissertation, Rowan University).

Nina, N., Rahmalia, E., Ramadani, A. F., Mirawan, A. K., Chairunnisa, C., Herdianti, F., Ardilla, A. A., & Wulandari, I. L. (2022). Penerapan Learning Management System BelajarBareng. id di SMK Negeri 1 Leuwiliang pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1686

Oguguo, B. C., Nannim, F. A., Agah, J. J., Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ene, C. U., & Nzeadibe, A. C. (2021). Effect of learning management system on Student’s performance in educational measurement and evaluation. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1471-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10318-w

Olugbade, D., Ojo, O. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2023). Challenges and limitations of Moodle LMS in handling large-scale projects: West-African Universities lecturers’ perspective. Journal of Educational Technology and Instruction, 2(2), 47-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.70290/jeti.v2i2.71

Oluwajana, D., Nat, M., & Fadiya, S. (2019). An Investigation of Students’ Interactivity in the Classroom and within Learning Management System to Improve Learning Outcomes. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 21(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i1.3085

Peerapolchaikul, T., Suealek, N., & Rojpibulstit, P. (2019). Students’ Attitudes Towards the Effectiveness of Moodle Platform at Preclinical-Medical Level in PBL Curriculum. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 60(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0045

Prasetya, R. E. (2023). The Interplay between Self-Regulated Learning Behavioral Factors and Students’ Performance in English Language Learning Through Moodle. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i3.66613

Puspita, A., Fahmi, M., & Yuningsih, Y. (2019). Perancangan dan Pembuatan Aplikasi E-Learning Menggunakan Model Waterfall pada Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 1(4), 173–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.34288/jri.v1i4.94

Salim, A. Y., & Alijoyo, F. A. (2024). Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Manajemen Layanan Magang di Diskominfo Kabupaten Purwakarta Berbasis Web dengan Menggunakan Metode Extreme Programming. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 9(1), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v9i1.4434

Sandvik, L. V., & Sommervold, O. A. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of Involvement in the Assessment of Oral Competence in English as a Second Language. Languages, 6(4), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040203

Saputra, K. S., Halimi, S. S., & Anjarningsih, H. Y. (2024). Paradigm Shift of Online English Language Platform as an Assessment Standard System. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 9(2).

Setiawan, R., Putranto, A., Princes, E., Geraldina, I., Julianti, E., Safitri, J., & Pannen, P. (2024). Tech-Driven Transformation: Innovative Pricing Strategies for E-Learning. IEEE Access. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3392489

Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, J. L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., ... & Gibson, D. C. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society.

Suriaman, A., Manurung, K., Mukrim, M., Apridayani, A., & Agussatriana, A. (2023). Effective or Impractical? Discussing Students’ Perceptions Toward Learning Management Systems in English Language Learning. IJoLE: International Journal of Language Education, 7(2), 330–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.43495

Susanti, W., Yuliendi, R. R., Ambiyar, A., & Wakhinuddin, W. (2020). Perancangan Pembelajaran E-Learning Bahasa Inggris untuk Pemula Berbasis Multimedia. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v18i1.1601

Syarafina, D. F. (2021). Effectiveness of English Online Learning Strategies During the Covid Pandemic at SMP Muhammadiyah 10 Sidoarjo. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 10. https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs20211171

Ustun, A. B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2021). Investigating the role of accepting learning management system on students’ engagement and sense of community in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4751-4769. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10500-8

Wicaksono, G. W., Juliani, G. A., Wahyuni, E. D., Cholily, Y. M., Asrini, H. W., & Budiono. (2020). Analysis of Learning Management System Features based on Indonesian Higher Education National Standards using the Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis. 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT49345.2020.9166459

Zarkasih, A., Ali, M. K., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Tren Penelitian Penerapan Prinsip ESG dalam Praktik Akuntansii. Business and Investment Review, 2(3), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.61292/birev.125

Zh, M. H. R., Putra, M. F. B., Kuswandi, D., Wedi, A., & Ardiansyah, A. (2024). Developing Wordwall Evaluations in Blended Islamic Education Using the Smith and Ragan Model. Al-Aulia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 10(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.46963/aulia.v10i1.1915

Published
2025-01-21
How to Cite
Priyeti, S., Degeng, M. D. K., & Wedi, A. (2025). Learning Management System vs Conventional Assessment: Reviewing the Best Assessment for English subjects. Journal La Sociale, 6(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i1.1800