The Concept of Resolving the Conflict of Norms Between Criminal Confiscation and General Bankruptcy Confiscation of Bankruptcy Assets Viewed from the Perspective of Justice
Abstract
In the scope of business, business actors, both individuals and legal entities, often borrow money (debt) with the aim of obtaining capital intended for the continuity of their business activities. In practice, often a debtor fails to fulfil his obligations or achievements, not because it is caused by force majeure (overmatch). Such a situation is called default. In Bankruptcy Law, there is a type of confiscation, namely general confiscation. In connection with that, there is a conflict of norms between the provisions of general confiscation in Article 31 paragraph (2) of Law No. 37 of 2004 with the provisions of criminal confiscation / confiscation in Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research method uses normative juridical and empirical juridical approaches. The data used in legal research are primary data and secondary data. The results of this study, the Government as the Regulator is expected to immediately make a legal formulation policy in connection with the general confiscation of bankruptcy as regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 and criminal confiscation as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and other related regulations, and in order to seek justice in law enforcement, especially related to confiscation of bankruptcy property, in essence the provisions of laws and regulations do not contradict each other, must be in harmony in order to ensure legal certainty and legal protection in its implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to revise the two confiscation provisions regulated in the two regulations, especially the general bankruptcy confiscation provisions regulated in Article 31 of Law No. 37 of 2004.
References
Adati, M. A. (2018). Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Yang Dapat Di Pidana Menurut Pasal 378 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 6(4), 9–10.
Assiddiqie, J. (1994). Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Ichtiar Varu Van Hoeve.
Black, H. C. (1992). Black’s Law Dictionaryi, Sixth Edition. West Publishing Co.
Fauzia, N. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penolakan Pembayaran Utang Oleh Kreditor Pada Saat Permohonan Pailit Diajukan (Studi Kasus: Kepailitan PT. Hendratna Plymood). Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v12i1.199
Hamzah, A. (1986). Pengusutan Perkara Melalui Saranan Teknik dan Sarana Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.
Harahap, K. (2009). Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Menuju Perubahan Ke-5. Grafiti.
Hartono, S. R. (1999). Hukum Perdata Sebagai Dasar Hukum Kepailitan Modern. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 7, 9.
Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesis, 16(3), 308.
Isfardiyana, S. H. (2016). Sita Umum Kepailitan Mendahului Sita Pidana dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Padjadjaran, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n3.a10
Purwosutjipto, H. M. N. (1999). Pengertian Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia. Djambatan.
Saliman, A. R. (2005). Hukum Bisnis Untuk Perusahaan: Teori dan Contoh Kasus. Renada Media Group.
Sambas, N. (2016). Pendekatan Kebijakan Formulasi Terhadap Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 4(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v4i2.380
Shubhan, M. H. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Cetakan Ke-6. Kencana.
Soemitro, R. H. (1988). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
Subekti. (2001). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Itermasa.
Sumarni. (2017). Hukum Kepailitan. Kencana.
Suyuthi, W. (2004). Sita dan Eksekusi Praktek Kejurusitaan Pengadilan. PT. Tatanusa.
Syarif, M., Sunarmi, & Yunara, E. (2023). Kedudukan Sita Pidana Harta Benda Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dengan Kedudukan Sita Umum Kepailitan. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(9), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i9.230
Tandra, S. (2020). Sita Umum yang Di Atasnya Terdapat Sita Pidana. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Waluyo, B. (2002). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Sinar Grafika.
Yanuarsi, S. (2020). Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas Sudut Pandang Tanggung Jawab Direksi. Jurnal Solusi, 18(2), 289.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal La Sociale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
