Settlement of Traffic Offences: A Shift in the Presumption of Innocence and the Impact on Legal Justice

Beny Harkat; Nandang  Sambas; Chepi Ali  Firman Zakaria

doi:10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i3.1175

Beny Harkat Faculty of Law, Postgraduate Masters & Doctoral Programme, Islamic University of Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Nandang Sambas Faculty of Law, Postgraduate Masters & Doctoral Programme, Islamic University of Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria Faculty of Law, Postgraduate Masters & Doctoral Programme, Islamic University of Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i3.1175

Keywords: Principles, Law, Justice, Traffic, Offences

Abstract

Traffic offences are a serious issue in Indonesia, creating complex challenges for the justice system and social costs. Although Law No. 22/2009 has defined the rules, the high number of accidents and offences indicates the ineffectiveness of law enforcement. This study aims to investigate the impact of traffic offences on legal justice, the effectiveness of sanctions, and the shifting presumption of innocence in Indonesia. The research methodology included both quantitative and qualitative approaches, involving analyses of accident data and interviews with authorities. The results showed a high number of offences, a lack of effectiveness of Law No. 22 of 2009, and the phenomenon of "peace in place." The implementation of ETLE cameras became an alternative, despite internet access constraints. Perma No. 12/2016 changed the judicial process, moving from a presumption of innocence to a presumption of guilt. This shift provides uniform sanctions without considering individual circumstances. The limitation of violators' rights in ticket hearings violates the principle of justice. The implementation of e-ticket technology shows advantages, but the dependence on the internet and the potential for misuse are obstacles. The shift to the presumption of innocence in the Perma raises doubts about the fairness of the justice system. Improving fairness requires a re-evaluation of the application of sanctions, technological improvements, and a deeper understanding of the rights of offenders. These recommendations are expected to improve the justice system related to traffic offences in Indonesia.

References

Abdurrahman. (1979). Aneka Masalah Hukum Dalam Pembangunan di Indonesia. Alumni.

Amin, R., Pratama, A., & Manalu, I. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Tilang Elektronik Terhadap Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Wilayah Hukum Polda Metro Jaya. Krtha Bhayangkara, 14(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v14i2.148

Arfiani, A. A., Fahmi, K. K., Arrasuli, B. K., Nadilah, I. N., & Fikri, M. F. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Sesuai Prinsip Peradilan Yang Berkepastian, Adil Dan Manusiawi : Studi Pemantauan Proses Penegakan Hukum Tahun 2020. Riau Law Journal, 6(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i1.7938

Armala, Y., & Yasir, M. (2022). Implementasi Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (E-TLE) Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resor Bojonegoro. JUSTITIABLE -Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro, 5(1), 32–44. https://ojs.ejournalunigoro.com/index.php/JUSTITIABLE/article/view/405

Davies, M., Croall, H., & Tyrer, J. (1995). Criminal Justice and Introduction to the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales. Longman Group Limited.

Gazali, A. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan Berdasarkan Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) Dalam Kaitan Prinsip Sanksi Pidana Hanya Dapat Dijatuhkan Melalui Proses Peradilan. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 382–404. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v14i2.5707

Hamzah, A. (2005). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yarsif Watampone.

Harahap, Y. (2014). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.

Hidayat, T., Semendawai, A. H., & Mawadi, H. (2022). Efektifitas Penindakan Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Menggunakan E-Tilang (Studi Kasus Satuan Lalu Lintas Polrestabes Bandung). Veritas, 8(2), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v8i2.2068

John Kenedi. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. In Pustaka Pelajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Kurniati, L., Salsabilla, A., Arjuna, M. M., & Salsabila, S. (2023). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan. Al-Qisthas: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik, 14(2), 119–133.

Marsaid, Hidayat, M., & Ahsan. (2013). Lalu Lintas pada Pengendara Sepeda Motor di Wilayah Polres. Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan, 1(2), 98–112.

Mulyadi, M. (2008). Criminal Policy:Pendekatan Integral Penal Policy dan Non Penal Policy Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Kekerasan. Pustaka Bangsa Pres.

Pardede, C. R. V., Nita, S., & Setyabudi, C. M. (2022). Analisis Program Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (Etle) Dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kamseltibcarlantas (Studi Kasus Kota Serang). Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 1(8), 533–542.

Sabadina, U. (2020). Penerapan E-Tilang Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 1(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v1i1.9157

Sunaryo, S., Fakih, M., Syamsiar, R., & Kasmawati, K. (2020). Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Terciptanya Tertib Lalu Lintas Di Jalan Raya. Sakai Sambayan Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.23960/jss.v4i2.186

Sundari, S. (2005). Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijakan Lingkungan Nasional. Airlangga University Pres.

Wahyuni, F. M., Eddy, T., & Sahari, A. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Persidangan Cepat Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas (Studi Satlantas Polrestabes Medan). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 3(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i1.197