The Significance of Teacher Mastery of Student Psychology in Teaching and Learning Process

Husnul  Khatimah; Aslin  Antonius

doi:10.37899/journallaedusci.v1i5.257

Husnul Khatimah English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher and Training, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
Aslin Antonius English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher and Training, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v1i5.257

Keywords: Psychological, Learning Process, Students Spiritual

Abstract

This study discusses teacher mastery of students psychology in Learning process. Forms of the Student's (spiritual) Psychological Aspects Intelligence/level of Student Intelligence is the ability to react / adapt to the environment student attitude It is a tendency to respond in a relatively constant manner to all objects of people, goods, etc, both positively and negatively. The Role of teachers in fostering student Psychology important psychological factor in achieving learning success, every prospective teacher/professional teacher needs to have knowledge and understanding of intelligence so that they can understand the level of intelligence of their students. it can be interpreted that the role of the teacher in coaching students' psychology which includes internal aspects (intelligence, talents, attitudes, interests and motivation) as well as external aspects of students are very important.

References

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of experimental social psychology, 38(2), 113-125.

Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 167-177.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1997). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge University Press.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child development, 82(1), 405-432.

Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and teacher education, 21(4), 343-356.

Jolly, J. L., & Hughes, C. E. (2015). The educational experience for student with gifts and talents.

Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media.

Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58-74.

Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805.

MacDonald, D. (2004). Collaborating with students' spirituality. Professional School Counseling, 293-300.

Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic approaches to bilingualism, 1(3), 213-237.

Selvester, P. M., & Summers, D. G. (2015). Socially responsible literacy: Teaching adolescents for purpose and power. Teachers College Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The journal of academic librarianship, 31(1), 46-53.