Learning Media Based on the Sun Bear Educational Module on Indonesian Biodiversity Material
Abstract
This study aims to develop a learning media based on a honey bear education module used in the Indonesian biodiversity material for seventh-grade junior high school students. The background of this study is based on the importance of strengthening biodiversity material through a contextual approach that includes environmental conservation values, especially the protection of endemic species such as the honey bear (Helarctos malayanus). This study uses the ADDIE development model which includes five stages, namely: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research instruments include expert validation sheets (material, media, and language), science teacher validation sheets, student response questionnaires, and learning outcome tests (pre-test and post-test). The limited trial subjects were 25 seventh-grade students at a junior high school in Balikpapan. The results of the material expert validation showed a feasibility percentage of 78.67%, media expert validation of 56.36%, and validation by science teachers of 81.33%. The module was declared feasibility after being revised based on input from experts. The effectiveness test results using a paired t-test showed a significance value of 0.033 (p < 0.05), which means there is a significant difference between student learning outcomes before and after using the module. Furthermore, student responses to the module showed a high level of interest in the content and presentation of the material, as well as an increased awareness of the importance of biodiversity conservation. Thus, this sun bear education module has proven to be feasible and effective for use in science learning on biodiversity material.
References
Ahirwar, N. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental Education and Conservation of Biodiversity. Environmental Education and Conservation of Biodiversity, 12(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01968-6_2
Arsyad, A. (2017). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Baptista, G. C. S., & Molina-Andrade, A. (2023). Science teachers’ conceptions about the importance of teaching and how to teach western science to students from traditional communities. Human arenas, 6(4), 704-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00257-4
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025, February). Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1518602). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
Carmi, N. (2013). Caring about tomorrow: Future orientation, environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 430-444.
Cote, N. (2024). Qualitative Case Study on Differentiated Instruction: Because Classrooms Are No Longer One-Size-Fits-All (Doctoral dissertation, National University).
Daryanto, & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran abad 21. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
De Bernard, M., Comunian, R., & Gross, J. (2022). Cultural and creative ecosystems: a review of theories and methods, towards a new research agenda. Cultural Trends, 31(4), 332-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.2004073
Estes, M. (2022). Differentiated Instruction in Higher Education: An Embedded Qualitative Single Case Study. Baylor University.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). Kondisi pembelajaran dan teori pembelajaran (Edisi ke-4). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Gerona-Daga, M. E. B., & Salmo III, S. G. (2022). A systematic review of mangrove restoration studies in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 987737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.987737
Haverly, C., Lyle, A., Spillane, J. P., Davis, E. A., & Peurach, D. J. (2022). Leading instructional improvement in elementary science: State science coordinators' sense‐making about the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9), 1575-1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21767
Heryanto, A. (2013). Public intellectuals, media and democratization: cultural politics of the middle classes in Indonesia. In Challenging Authoritarian Rule-SEA NIP (pp. 24-59). Routledge.
Hidayatullah, M. (2010). Pendidikan karakter: Membangun peradaban bangsa. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
Holmes, K., Mackenzie, E., Berger, N., & Walker, M. (2021, August). Linking K-12 STEM pedagogy to local contexts: A scoping review of benefits and limitations. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 693808). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693808
Husamah, H., Rahardjanto, A., Permana, T. I., & Shukri, A. A. M. (2025). Integration of Digital Technologies in Environmental Education: A Systematic Review of Trends, Impacts, and Future Directions. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 30-47.
Ismail. (2016). Diagnosis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran aktif di sekolah. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(Januari).
Jalkanen, J. (2015). Development of pedagogical design in technology-rich environments for language teaching and learning. Jyväskylä studies in humanities, (265).
Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. University College Cork.
Krajcik, J., Schneider, B., Miller, E. A., Chen, I. C., Bradford, L., Baker, Q., ... & Peek-Brown, D. (2023). Assessing the effect of project-based learning on science learning in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 60(1), 70-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312221129247
Krämer, B. J., & Han, P. (2009). Educational content creation and sharing in a technology-rich environment. International journal on Advances in Software, 2(2).
Lécuyer, L., Balian, E., Butler, J. R. A., Barnaud, C., Calla, S., Locatelli, B., ... & Young, J. C. (2024). The importance of understanding the multiple dimensions of power in stakeholder participation for effective biodiversity conservation. People and Nature, 6(4), 1407-1420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10672
Li, T., Chen, I. C., Adah Miller, E., Miller, C. S., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2024). The relationships between elementary students' knowledge‐in‐use performance and their science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(2), 358-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.21900
Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018, June). Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: An integrative review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 3, p. 49). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049
Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long–term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(6), 1149-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x
Mendes, T., Teixeira, H., Lopes, A. M., & Correia, A. (2025). From environmental knowledge to pro-environmental behaviors: Paving the way for more sustainable higher education institutions through a mission refocus. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10181-8
Miller, K. K., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2024). Digital micro-credentials in environmental science: an employer perspective on valued evidence of skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(4), 1058-1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2053953
Ni’mah, A., Arianti, E. S., Suyanto, S., Putera, S. H. P., & Nashrudin, A. (2024). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) methods within an independent curriculum (a literature review). Sintaksis: Publikasi Para ahli Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, 2(4), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v2i4.859
Niemi, K. (2021). ‘The best guess for the future?’Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 282-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371
Nisa, R., & Hanum, F. (2024). Implementation of an independent learning curriculum in enhancing student creativity in primary schools. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 4(2), 555-567.
Nolen, S. B., Wetzstein, L., & Goodell, A. (2020). Designing material tools to mediate disciplinary engagement in environmental science. Cognition and Instruction, 38(2), 179-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1718677
Okpara, G. C. (2025). PHILOSOPHY OF ONLINE LEARNING IN NIGERIA: CAN VIRTUAL EDUCATION REPLACE TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS?. Nnadiebube Journal of Education in Africa, 10(3).
Ong, X. R., Tan, B., Chang, C. H., Puniamoorthy, N., & Slade, E. M. (2025). Identifying the knowledge and capacity gaps in Southeast Asian insect conservation. Ecology Letters, 28(1), e70038. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70038
Parker, S. (2024). Transformation of International Students' Perceptions of Indonesian Culture in the Era of Diversity. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 3(1), 49-60. https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.33650/ijess.v3i1.7714
Pastini, N. W., & Lilasari, L. N. T. (2023). Empowering EFL students: A review of student-centred learning effectiveness and impact. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 7(2), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v7i2.246-259
Qamariyah, S. N., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Alsulami, N. M. (2021). The Effect of Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning with Socio-Scientific Issues on Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 210-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.30863
Robinson, J. M., Harrison, P. A., Mavoa, S., & Breed, M. F. (2022). Existing and emerging uses of drones in restoration ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(9), 1899-1911. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13912
Roussou, A. M., Argyrakou, C. C., & Milakis, E. D. (2025). Integrating STEAM and theatrical methods in early childhood environmental education: A framework for holistic learning. International Journal of Geography, Geology and Environment, 7(2), 19-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.22271/27067483.2025.v7.i2a.336
Russell, M. (2010). A personalised assessment programme in Engineering Education (Doctoral dissertation).
Shemeen, A., Sangeetha, P. V., Deepa, S., Vinay, M., & Jayapriya, J. (2025). Implementing Learning Analytics in Educational Systems to Effectively Integrate and Cater to Different Learning Styles. In Revolutionizing Education With Remote Experimentation and Learning Analytics (pp. 203-228). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Stelzer, T., Gladding, G., Mestre, J. P., & Brookes, D. T. (2009). Comparing the efficacy of multimedia modules with traditional textbooks for learning introductory physics content. American Journal of Physics, 77(2), 184-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3028204
Tun, K. Z., Pramanik, M., Chakrabortty, R., Chowdhury, K., Halder, B., Pande, C. B., ... & Zhran, M. (2024). Mainstreaming nature-based solutions for climate adaptation in Southeast Asia: a systematic review. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00473-2
UNESCO. (2015). Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) dalam pendidikan: Kurikulum untuk sekolah dan program pengembangan guru. Paris: UNESCO.
Wells, A. (2018). Innovative learning environments as agents of teaching and learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Auckland University of Technology. https://openrepository. aut. ac. nz/bitstream/handle/10292/12058/WellsAWJ. pdf.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal La Edusci

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



