Development of Teaching Materials and Harmonized Semester Learning Plan for the Aircraft Basic Workshop Theory Course through Learner-Centered Instructional Design in Indonesian Aviation Polytechnics

  • Mulyadi Nur Makassar Aviation Polytechnic
  • Fatmawati Sabur Makassar Aviation Polytechnic
Keywords: Harmonization, Learning, Aircraft Basic, Workshop Theory

Abstract

This paper meets the on-going challenge of gaps in the training of Aircraft Basic Workshop Theory course as part of Indonesian aviation polytechnic that seeks to develop an organized competency-based teaching material and integrated RPS (Rencanna Pembelajaran Semester). By using both a Research and Development (R&D) structure borrowed on the 4D model-Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate and a qualitative (1W) section, the research will combine the validation of stakeholders with the query of the learners to evidence that the pedagogy is relevant and the implementation is possible within the institution. Primary data were collected using the analysis of the curriculum, the consultation of experts, and instrumentation based on the cadets, such as structured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews of Surabaya and Makassar Aviation Polytechnics. Define and Design phase findings showed severe shortage between the formal curriculum requirements and course delivery that involved lack of sequencing of learners; Matching words to learning outcomes and provision of instructional support materials. The created teaching unit and updated RPS has been directly targeting these shortcomings by providing a weekly structure of goals, procedures, and evaluations based on national standards of competencies. At the Disseminate step, the institutional review verified that the instructional tools were usable, adaptable and had systemic worth in various campuses. Above all, acute learner disenfranchisement was identified by the 1W component: cadets claimed that there was a significant level of confusion, the absence of instructional structure, and procedure uncertainty in workshop learning settings.

References

Anggraini, V., Syahrul, Darnis, A., & Maistika, R. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar membaca sastra berbasis graphic organizer Venn diagram di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.513

Anwar. (2009). Penilaian sikap ilmiah dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu, 2(5), 103–114.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar. Erlangga.

Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Dewi, E. R. (2018). Metode pembelajaran modern dan konvensional pada sekolah menengah atas. Pembelajar: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.26858/pembelajar.v2i1.5442

Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Rineka Cipta: Jakarta. Dimyati dan Mudjion,(1999), Belaja dan Pembelajaran, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Duron, R. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166.

Endah, N., & Hendrastomo, G. (2017). Implementasi pendidikan karakter melalui perkuliahan etika dan profesi keguruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 7(2), 240–254.

Erman, S. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Eryilmaz, A., Yildiz, M., & Akin, F. (2011). Investigating of relationships between attitudes towards physics laboratories, motivation and amotivation for the class engagement. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education (Special Issue), 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3iSI.123

Ferris, T. L., & Aziz, S. (2005). A psychomotor skills extension to Bloom's taxonomy of education objectives for engineering education (Doctoral dissertation, National Cheng Kung University Tainan).

Freire, P. (1970). The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom. Harvard educational review, 40(2), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.2.q7n227021n148p26

Fujiawati, F. S. (2016). Pemahaman konsep kurikulum dan pembelajaran dengan peta konsep bagi mahasiswa pendidikan seni. JPKS (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kajian Seni), 1(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpks.v1i1.849

Gruppen, L. D., Burkhardt, J. C., Fitzgerald, J. T., Funnell, M., Haftel, H. M., Lypson, M. L., ... & Vasquez, J. A. (2016). Competency‐based education: programme design and challenges to implementation. Medical education, 50(5), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12977

Habibati, M. N., & Septiani, P. D. (2019). Pengembangan handout berbasis literasi sains pada materi larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit. Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA (JIPI), 3(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v3i1.13824

Hafid, A. (2011). Sumber dan media pembelajaran. Sulesana: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman, 6(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.24252/.v6i2.1403

Hidayat, N. (2009). Pengembangan pembelajaran terpadu model connected untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran IPA. Jurnal Inovasi Kurikulum, 4(1), 15–29.

Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 37(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818

Huda, S., & Qosyim, M. (2013). Penerapan IPA terpadu tipe connected dengan model cooperative learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi perubahan fisika dan kimia di SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surabaya. E-Journal Pendidikan Sains UNESA, 1(2).

Irawati, H., & Saifuddin, M. F. (2018). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan bahan ajar matakuliah pengantar profesi guru biologi di Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta. Biopedagogi: Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi, 7(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.20961/biopedagogi.v7i2.27636

Julaeha, S. (2019). Problematika kurikulum dan pembelajaran pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.36667/jppi.v7i2.367

Lee, J. Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2009). Heuristic task analysis on e-learning course development: a formative research study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9016-1

Lilawati, J. (2017). Analisis pemanfaatan sumber belajar dalam proses pembelajaran. Dalam Seminar Nasional Tahunan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan Tahun 2017. Digital Repository Universitas Negeri Medan.

Majumdar, S. (2011). Teacher education in TVET: Developing a new paradigm. International Journal of Training Research, 9(1-2), 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.9.1-2.49

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 41(1), 31-48. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.004

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Noddings, N. (2005). Identifying and responding to needs in education. Cambridge Journal of education, 35(2), 147-159. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/03057640500146757

O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of educational research, 78(1), 33-84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793

Oropesa García, I. (2012). Conceptual framework for the design, implementation and validation of psychomotor skills’ assessment systems in minimally invasive surgery (Doctoral dissertation, Telecomunicacion).

Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Saldívar García, E. (2020). The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-based reform. Aera Open, 6(2), 2332858420932828. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932828

Perkins, R. D. (1992). Deixis, grammar, and culture. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.24

Rees Lewis, D. G., Gerber, E. M., Carlson, S. E., & Easterday, M. W. (2019). Opportunities for educational innovations in authentic project-based learning: understanding instructor perceived challenges to design for adoption. Educational technology research and development, 67, 953-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09673-4

Rizki, S., Linuhung, N., & Dacholfany, M. I. (2016). Design research and development 4D model for developing mathematics teaching materials. In The First International Conference on Education ICONLEE (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 288-291).

Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2009). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 233-262). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_9

Sen, A., & Selvaratnam, L. (2022). Future-proofing healthcare skills education: Technology-enhanced collaborative learning and peer teaching strategies for large student cohorts in anatomy practicals. In Collaborative active learning: Practical activity-based approaches to learning, assessment and feedback (pp. 179-212). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2078-5_11

Shay, P. W. (2023). Precluding Critical Pedagogy: Ethical Democracy and the Tyranny of Functional Metrics, Visible Learning, and Data Surveillance. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 21(3).

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology,translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

Suartama, I. K., Triwahyuni, E., & Suranata, K. (2022). Context-aware ubiquitous learning based on case methods and team-based projects: Design and validation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110802

Sumarsono, R. B., Rochmawati, R., Zulkarnain, W., Prestiadi, D., Ubaidilah, E., Bhayangkara, A. N., & Indrawanto, D. W. (2024). Pelatihan Pengembangan Modul Ajar Berbasis Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Bantur Kabupaten Malang: Training on the Development of Teaching Modules Based on the Implementation of the" Merdeka" Curriculum for Elementary School Teachers in Bantur District, Malang Regency. PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 9(10), 1780-1788. https://doi.org/10.33084/pengabdianmu.v9i10.7507

Uduafemhe, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of additional cognitive and psychomotor skills contents for satellite transmission and reception module for technical colleges in Nigeria. An Unpublished PhD Thesis presented to the Department of industrial and technology Education, Federal University of Technology Minna, Niger state, Nigeria.

Wahid, M. S. A., & Widoyoko, B. S. (2015). Pengaruh Motivasi, Lingkungan Kerja Dan Pelatihan-Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Guru PNS Di Taman Kanak-kanak/Sekolah Dasar Kecamatan Ngawen Kabupaten Blora The Influence of Motivation, Work Environment and Training on Performance of Civil Servant Teachers in Kindergarten/Elementary School District Ngawen Blora. Jurnal Magister, 2(7).

Wei, L. (2021). Teaching Academic Vocabulary to English Language Learners (ELLs). Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.01

Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency‐based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701505540

Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12006

Published
2025-07-10
How to Cite
Nur, M., & Sabur, F. (2025). Development of Teaching Materials and Harmonized Semester Learning Plan for the Aircraft Basic Workshop Theory Course through Learner-Centered Instructional Design in Indonesian Aviation Polytechnics. Journal La Edusci, 6(2), 284-307. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v6i2.2244