Satisfaction of Sanitation Services in Uttar Pradesh with Special Reference to Gorakhpur District of Uttar Pradesh, India
Sanitation is one of the most important aspect for an individuals and also good for the healthy life, and protection from the various diseases. To achieved the complete cleanness in the country, the central and state governments are jointly operating the sanitation related services in the state. This study is an attempt to assess the satisfaction level from the sanitation services in Gorakhpur district of Uttar Pradesh. For this purpose, 285 sample have been selected randomly in both rural (165) and urban (120) habitants of the district. The satisfaction of sanitation services has been measured with respect to three variables that are gender, habitat, and community. For the analysis of data, a descriptive statistics techniques such as Mean, Standard Deviation and ANOVA, have been used. After careful analysis of data, one can find out that the female population (Grand Mean = 8.0446) are less satisfied with sanitation service as compared to male population (Grand Mean = 9.2656). It is also revealed from the data analysis that urban population (Grand Mean = 11.8500) are satisfied with sanitation services as compared to rural population (Grand Mean = 6.2242) of the district. Therefore, the findings of the study advises that a suitable mechanism must be require or available ones need to more straighten to monitored on the sanitation services in rural areas of the district and for better sanitation services government should encourage a women’s self-help group to participate in it.
Banerjee, A., Banik, N., & Dalmia, A. (2016). Demand for household sanitation: The case of India (No. 154). ARTNeT Working Paper Series.Hajra, G., & Dutta, A. (2017). The gap between construction and usage of toilets: An under-identified problem. Arthaniti-Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 16(1-2), 1-26.
Coffey, D., Gupta, A., Hathi, P., Khurana, N., Srivastav, N., Vyas, S., & Spears, D. (2014). Open defecation: evidence from a new survey in rural north India. Economic and Political Weekly, 43-55.
Ghosh A., Cairncross S. (2014), The uneven progress of sanitation in India. Water Sanitation Hyg. Dev 4(1), pp. 15–22
Hajra, G., & Dutta, A. (2017). The gap between construction and usage of toilets: An under-identified problem. Arthaniti-Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 16(1-2), 1-26.
Kaliski, J. (2015). The Past, Present, and Future of Sanitation, with a Case Study of India: Where and Why We Should Give a Sh* t (Doctoral dissertation, Amherst College).
Mane, K. H. (2010). Commuters Satisfaction with Reference to ServiceProvide by MSRTC. International Referred Research Journal, 2(18).
O’Reilly, K., & Louis, E. (2014). The toilet tripod: Understanding successful sanitation in rural India. Health & place, 29, 43-51.
Shegokar, V. V., Ramteke, D. S., & Meshram, P. U. (2015). Design and treatability studies of low cost grey water treatment with respect to recycle and reuse in rural areas. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4(8), 113-124.
Tripathi V. & Kumar S. (2016). Do Government Interventions Moderate Psycho-social Factors and Sanitation Behaviour? Study of Rural Uttar Pradesh in India, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol, 5, pp. 9768–9777.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal La Bisecoman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.