Legal Consequences for Companies that Carry Out Unilateral Termination of Employment
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the Company taking steps to streamline company costs by laying off workers. Many companies experience labor relations disputes, one of which is that the company carries out unilateral termination of employment (PHK) of workers without negotiating with the workers and does not pay attention to the rights of these workers. This research aims to find out and examine the mechanism for resolving industrial relations disputes in Badung Regency as well as knowing and studying the legal consequences for companies that carry out unilateral layoffs of workers with a fixed term work agreement (PKWT) and workers with a fixed term work agreement (PKWTT) in Badung Regency. This research is empirical legal research with a factual approach and a statutory approach. The research results confirm that there are 2 (two) alternative dispute resolution mechanisms for industrial disputes, either through non-litigation channels, namely by bipartite negotiations, mediation, conciliation, arbitration or by litigation, namely through the industrial relations court (PHI). Layoffs can be said to be valid if they have received a decision from the PHI and if without this decision the employer continues to lay off workers in PKWT and PKWTT who received layoffs unilaterally, then the layoffs are not legally valid and are considered null and void. The legal sanction for employers who lay off PKWT workers before their term of employment ends is to fulfill the workers' rights, namely by providing severance pay, gratuity money, compensation money due to the layoff.
References
Asuan, A., & Rizayusmanda, R. (2023). Workers Rights’ Implications Who Have Experienced Termination of Employment According to The Law Number 13 of 2003 Concerning Employment. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(1), 129-136.
Asya, V. R., Riani, A., & Lavidya, V. (2023). Juridical Review Of Cases Of Unilateral Termination Of Employment Based On Labor Law. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(3), 2582-2593.
Aviariska, A. M. (2020). Regional Quarantine Policy Related to Handling Covid-19 Pandemics in Various Countries. Media Gizi Kesmas, 9(2), 67-73.
Barnard, C. (2020). EU ‘Social’Policy From Employment Law to Labour Market Reform.
Haitami, M., & Rengganis, A. (2021). The Dilemma of Good Governance Implementation in Indonesia during the Pandemic of Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19). JASSP, 1(1), 55-67.
Iswardani, W. (2021). Hydroponic Vegetable Production Planning at Plantation Parung Farm Bogor. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Sain & Teknologi, 1(1), 8-15.
Madia, P. B. M., Bagiastra, I. N., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2022). Legitimacy Of A Fixed-Term Employment Contract Based On Remote Work Concept From The Perspective Of The Job Creation Act. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues, 1(4), 65-74.
Marbun, J. (2020). The juridical analysis between collective labor agreements between employers and trade labor unions in the company. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), 303-310.
Pramono, A. (2020). Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes and Termination of Work Relations according to the Applicable Legislation. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 2(2), 169-194.
Suryana, E. A., & Azis, M. (2023). The potential of economic loss due to stunting in indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Kesehatan Indonesia, 8(1), 52-65.
Ulak, N. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on tourism industry in Nepal. Journal of Tourism & Adventure, 3(1), 50-75.
Yasa, I. G. W. M. (2020). Bali in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population and employment dilemmas. Jurnal Bali Membangun Bali, 1(3), 143-154.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal La Sociale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.