Study of Identity Politics in the 2019 Simultaneous Regional Head Election in Tarakan City, Indonesia
Abstract
As an archipelagic country with the largest number of ethnic groups and religions in the world, Indonesia is a multicultural and multi-religious country which currently influences the democratic process in Indonesia, one of which is the Regional Head Election (Pilkada). Tarakan City is an ethnically and religiously diverse city which in its democratic process is still influenced by issues of religious and ethnic sentiment which are accommodated and used well by political elites as instruments in every regional head election. This research uses a qualitative approach with case studies. Data collection techniques use interviews, documentation and audio visuals. The theories used in this research are identity politics, multiculturalism, political participation, political elites, and simultaneous regional elections. The data analysis used in this research refers to a data analysis model which includes three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and data verification. Based on the research results, it shows that political elites and regional head candidates seem to deliberately maintain or play identity politics, for political interests and power hegemony. This had an impact on the political reality in the 2019 Simultaneous Regional Head Election in Tarakan City. With a certain identity, regional head candidates can hold a bargaining position, which shows that ethnic and religious factors are significant enough to gain support and influence people's choices in the 2019 Simultaneous Regional Elections in Tarakan City. This also proves that the people of Tarakan are voters who only care about figures and similar backgrounds rather than the skills and abilities of regional head candidate pairs.
References
Acheampong, A. O., Opoku, E. E. O., & Dzator, J. (2022). Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate. Energy Economics, 109, 105942. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105942
Aisyah, D. N., Kiasatina, T., Wahyuni, I. R., Setiawan, A., Lokopessy, A. F., & Adisasmito, W. (2022). Democracy and Pandemic: Evaluating Health Protocol Compliance in Regional Election Using Integrated Monitoring System. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 116, S31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.074
Amlani, S., & Algara, C. (2021). Partisanship & nationalization in American elections: Evidence from presidential, senatorial, & gubernatorial elections in the U.S. counties, 1872–2020. Electoral Studies, 73, 102387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102387
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2023). Do voters prefer educated candidates? How candidate education influences vote choice in congressional elections. Electoral Studies, 82, 102596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102596
Cintolesi, A. (2022). Political polarization and primary elections. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 596–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.018
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dorling, D., Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (1998). The epidemiology of the Liberal Democrat vote. Political Geography, 17(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00063-7
Droubi, S., Heffron, R. J., & McCauley, D. (2022). A critical review of energy democracy: A failure to deliver justice? Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102444
Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies, 63, 102111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Fuad, A. B. B. (2014). Political Identity and Election in Indonesian Democracy: A Case Study in Karang Pandan Village – Malang, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 477–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.060
Hackenberger, A., Rümmele, M., Schwerter, J., & Sturm, M. (2021). Elections and unemployment benefits for families: Did the Family Benefit Dispute affect election outcomes in Germany? European Journal of Political Economy, 66, 101955. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101955
Hanretty, C. (2021). Forecasting multiparty by-elections using Dirichlet regression. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4), 1666–1676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.007
Johnson, C., & Middleton, A. (2016). Junior coalition parties in the British context: Explaining the Liberal Democrat collapse at the 2015 general election. Electoral Studies, 43, 63–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.007
Kriyantono, R., Ida, R., Tawakkal, G. T. I., & Safitri, R. (2022). Not just about representative: When democracy needs females and their competency to run Indonesian government public relations to management level. Heliyon, 8(1), e08714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08714
Lee, D., & Min, S. (2021). Defective democracy and the political budget cycle. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(4), 947–961. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2021.04.009
Leromain, E., & Vannoorenberghe, G. (2022). Voting under threat: Evidence from the 2020 French local elections. European Journal of Political Economy, 75, 102204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102204
Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi (ed.); 3rd ed.). UI-Press.
Nasution, I. K. (2014). Ethnicity, Democracy and Decentralization: Explaining the Ethnic Political Participation of Direct Election in Medan 2010. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 496–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.062
Nguyen, T. T. M., & Tran, Q. T. (2022). Democracy and dividend policy around the world. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101713
Park, J. H. (2022). Indonesian pluralities: Islam, citizenship, and democracy, Singapore, Robert Hefner and Zainal Abidin Bagir (eds), 2021, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. Asian Journal of Social Science, 50(2), 157–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2022.05.003
Rallings, C., Thrasher, M., Borisyuk, G., & Long, E. (2011). Forecasting the 2010 general election using aggregate local election data. Electoral Studies, 30(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.011
Siburian, M. E. (2022). The link between fiscal decentralization and poverty – Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 81, 101493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101493
Soedarwo, V. S. D. (2014). Political Ideology Meaning and Patriarchal Ideology of Female Politicians in Indonesia: A Case in Malang. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 486–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.061
Song, B. K. (2022). The longer-term electoral effect of carrying a state in U.S. presidential elections. Economics Letters, 216, 110574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110574
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal La Sociale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
