Analysis of Barriers to Sustainable Supply Chain Implementation Using DEMATEL and ISM Integration
Abstract
CV. XYZ found barriers that could hinder the implementation of a sustainable supply chain in the company. However, the company does not have a resolution method for determining the priority barriers that most influence the implementation. The aim of this research is to determine the barriers that influence the implementation of a sustainable supply chain. Settlement is carried out using the DEMATEL-ISM method. The research results show that the most influential barriers are lack of regulation and guidance from the government (A9) and high initial investment (A1). Because in the DEMATEL-ISM integration, these two factors were found to be located at the lowest level, which is the level with the most influential barriers, which are the main drivers. As a result, companies need to prioritize lack of regulation and guidance from the government and high initial investment as a basis for evaluation and improvement in implementing sustainable supply chains.
References
Adwiyah, R., Syaukat, Y., Indrawan, D., & Mulyati, H. (2023). Examining Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) Performance in the Palm Oil Industry with the Triple Bottom Line Approach. Sustainability, 15(18), 13362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813362
Ahmad, N., & Qahmash, A. (2021). Smartism: Implementation and assessment of interpretive structural modeling. Sustainability, 13(16), 8801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168801
Alam, I. N., & Wahyuningsih. (2023). Pengaruh Manajemen Rantai Pasok Berkelanjutan Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Yang Dimediasi Manajemen Hubungan Pelanggan Dan Keunggulan Kompetitif Pada Perusahaan Otomotif. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 3(2), 230–252.
Gardas, B. B., Mangla, S. K., Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B., & Luthra, S. (2019). Green talent management to unlock sustainability in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 850–862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.018
Gbolarumi, F. T., Wong, K. Y., & Olohunde, S. T. (2021). Sustainability assessment in the textile and apparel industry: A review of recent studies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012099
Gulo, Y. K. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Barista Dengan Menggunakan Metode DEMATEL Dan WASPAS (Studi Kasus: Coffee Corner Medan). KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika Dan Komputer, 1(05). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v1i5.168
Jalali, M., Feng, B., & Feng, J. (2022). An Analysis of Barriers to Sustainable Supply Chain Management Implementation: The Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach. Sustainability, 14(20), 13622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013622
Liu, Y., Wood, L. C., Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., & Farooque, M. (2021). Barriers to sustainable food consumption and production in China: A fuzzy DEMATEL analysis from a circular economy perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1114–1129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.028
Menon, R. R., & Ravi, V. (2021). Analysis of barriers of sustainable supply chain management in electronics industry: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100026
Permadi, G. S., Vitadiar, T. Z., & Kistofer, T. (2019). Sistem evaluasi bahan pembelajaran menggunakan metode Dematel dan ANP. JSINBIS (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 9(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol9iss2pp228-235
Raut, R., Gardas, B. B., & Narkhede, B. (2019). Ranking the barriers of sustainable textile and apparel supply chains: an interpretive structural modelling methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(2), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2017-0340
Rifaldi, M., Sumargo, B., & Zid, M. (2021). Penerapan Metode Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM) dalam Menyusun Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Bekasi). Prosiding ESEC.
Shakeri, H., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting project communications with a hybrid DEMATEL-ISM approach (A case study in Iran). Heliyon, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04430
Shanker, S., & Barve, A. (2021). Analysing sustainable concerns in diamond supply chain: a fuzzy ISM-MICMAC and DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(5), 1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1862351
Shukla, V., Upadhyay, A., & Khandve, B. (2020). Applications of Green Supply Chain Management in the U.K. Restaurant Industry. In Sustainable Supply Chains: Strategies, Issues, and Models (pp. 225–247). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48876-5_7
Singh, R., & Bhanot, N. (2020). An integrated DEMATEL-MMDE-ISM based approach for analysing the barriers of IoT implementation in the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Research, 58(8), 2454–2476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1675915
Zayed, E. O., & Yaseen, E. A. (2021). Barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation in Egyptian industries: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0271
Zhao, Z. Y., Chen, Y. L., & Li, H. (2019). What affects the development of renewable energy power generation projects in China: ISM analysis. Renewable Energy, 131, 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.063
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal La Multiapp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
