The Revitalization of Regional Literature as a Strategy to Improve Writing Ability and Reproducing Literature

  • Arinah Fransori Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Keywords: Revitalization of regional literature, writing and reproducing

Abstract

Along with the times, literature, culture and society are growing steadily. The Three are affected by the speed of movement conditions of social life in the development of modern society lifestyle. The importance of the revitalization process in literature basically is to restore the function of literary works against society. Its main purpose is to describe the influence learning strategy and the revitalization of the regional literary writing activities and reproduce literature. Thus it would be useful both theoretically and practically. It is directly enrich the regional literature as a form of Indonesian literature. The method used in this research is quasi-experimental method (quasi experiment). This study is called an unreal experiment, or also called a mock experiment. After conducting research with the strategy, there are 31 works of literature revitalized through folklore and regional stories that exist in Indonesia. The work then became one and a book entitled Reproduction of Regional Literature R5A. From the experimental results, the groups can be concluded that there is an average score between the experimental group and the control group. Known after consultation on table turns out significant number.

References

Andriani, T. (2015). Revitalisasi naskah syair: Sebuah solusi dalam pengembangan kreativitas mahasiswa untuk mencintai budaya lokal. Sosial Budaya, 11(1), 91–103.

Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Asdi Mahasatya.. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.

Dalman. (2014). Keterampilan menulis. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Djojosuroto, K. (n.d.). Surastina.(2009). Pembelajaran Apresiasi Sastra Sebagai Sarana Pengembangan Kreativitas Guru. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Book Publisher.

Emzir, M. (2013). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Faruk. (2012). Metode penelitian sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Keraf, G. (1994). Komposisi: Sebuah Pengantar Kemahiran Bahasa Oleh Gorys Keraf. Jakarta: Percetakan Ikrar Mandiri, edisi.

Neolaka, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian dan Statistik, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purnomo, M. H. (2010). Menguak Budaya dalam Karya Sastra: Antara Kajian Sastra dan Budaya. Endogami: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Antropologi, 1(1), 75–82.

Rafiek, M. (2010). Teori sastra: Kajian teori dan praktik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Rahyono, F. X. (2009). Kearifan budaya dalam kata. Wedatama Widya Sastra.

Ratna, N. K. (2007). Sastra dan cultural studies: representasi fiksi dan fakta. Pustaka Pelajar.

White, Ron dan Valerie Arndt. (2000). Process writing. London and New York:

Longman Handbooks for Language Teacher.

Zulfahnur, Z.F dan Sayuti Kurnia. (2008). Sejarah sastra. Buku Materi Pokok. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. ¬¬

Published
2020-12-31
How to Cite
Fransori, A. (2020). The Revitalization of Regional Literature as a Strategy to Improve Writing Ability and Reproducing Literature. Journal La Edusci, 1(6), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v1i6.241